Revenge and Delay in Hamlet Essay

The Tragedy of juncture, Prince of Denmark by William Shakespeare is iodin of his most powerful tragedies telling the story of treachery, strike back and moral corruption. The play is about Prince crossroads who haveks to exact r tied(p)ge on his uncle Claudius for murdering his fag juncture, Claudiuss br otherwise. Hamlets father then succeeds the throne and takes as his wife Gertrude, the old Kings Widow and Prince Hamlets father. As doth well reckon unit our state, But to rec over of us by strong (1. 1. 01-102) These say by Horatio, Prince Hamlets close friend reveals to the reader one of the crucial themes in this play, the need for revenge, not just by Hamlet precisely by Fortinbras, the Prince of Norway and Claudius through Laertes. Their emotions, thoughts and effect are fueled by their craving for vengeance and as the three revenge plots intertwine, it is revealed that the nature of revenge is not simple but complicated as the reader sees Hamlets inner struggle to take action, and his unfitness to make decisions.see moreconflict in hamletThe indecision, swinging and delay are what make the plot stand out from other revenge stories. The main plot in the play is that of Hamlet who is visited by the Ghost of his father telling him to strike back his death. Hamlets response was Hast me to knowt, that I, with wings as swift, As meditation or the thoughts of love, may sweep to my revenge (1. 5. 29-31)Sets the plot for revenge but later he is seen having his doubts as expressed in the line Fie upont, foh About, my brains (2. 2. 574).After Hamlet establishes Claudius guilt, by staging the murder of Gonzago he gets the opportunity to obscure the unattended Claudius in his chamber but allows this opportunity pass after soliloquizing the matter and verbalize that killing Claudius will not be revenge as he will go to heaven. Throughout the play he is reflective and contemplative and delays the moment as long as he possibly can. He is later exiled w hen he accidentally kills Polonius. After another visit by his fathers ghost he makes up his mind.He returns to Denmark and in a shut in match that ensues, he manages to kill both Laertes and Claudius even though he dies from the wound he received from the Poisoned tip of Laertes sword. Claudius on the other hand, uses Laertes as tool to carry out his plan to kill Hamlet. Laertes is blinded by the need of vengeance such he would do whatever it takes to accomplish this without any hesitation whatsoever. Claudius takes advantage of this situation and its quite evident in the following lines Laertes, was your father dear to you? be you like the painting of a sorrow (4. 7. 05-107) and To show your fathers son in deedmore than in words? (4. 7. 123-124) Laertes replies To cut throat ithe church. (4. 7. 125)Claudius cultivates this thirst and his ability to act rashly which drives him in a fencing match with Hamlet. This turns into a bloody ending and ultimately leads to Hamlet and Cla udius death. Fortinbras, the prince of Norway wants to avenge the death of his father by creating so large an armament that would over the Danish army. He is a strong-willed leader described as Hot and full (1. 1. 96), with a tendency to act rashly as opposed to Hamlets continual hesitation delay.While Hamlet is contemplating on the issues of life, death and morality of revenge, Fortinbras is out to conquer lands. However, he in like manner listens to his friend Horatio who advices him to wait before he attacks Denmark. This allows him in the end to win his vengeance without doing much. Hamlet himself considers Fortinbras a model of greatness, as he passed him with his army he remarks, To be great, is not to stir without great argument but to find quarrel in a straw, When honors at the stake. (4. 4. 52-55) Fortinbras is not bothered too much with thoughts and is ready(a) to take action to preserve his familys honor.In conclusion it can be utter that the main reason Hamlet fail s on his mission of vengeance is imputable to his hesitation partly brought by his own cowardice and partly ascribable to his inner conflict with the moral outlook of it all. Laertes fails because he is too quick to move into action without careful consideration of the situation at hand. Fortinbras on the other hand, succeeds because even though he was quick to take action, he listens to his uncles advice. In the end, this teaches the reader the importance of thinking clearly, coherently and viscid to our principles prior to taking any actions.