Hospitality & Tourism in Australia-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp

Questions: 1.Identify and discuss the prime ethical and governing issues presented in the Vanuatus Broken Dream video. 2.Did PO Cruises act ethically in this case? 3.Discuss how Australian and/or Vanuatus governments could have resolved identified issues. 4.Suggest at least three recommendations to overcome such issues in the future. Answers: 1.From the video, there are various ethical issues presented. The first issue in this case is failing to assist those who were supposed to be assisted with the money received from the tourists. Before the tourists arrived, the residents had great hope that a lot would change. When tourists flood in a particular area, some dollars were expected to move from the rich to the poor. From Vanuatus, this was not the case. The money which they thought would assist them to upgrade their lives were stolen for personal benefits. This was wrong based on the fact that the residents were in need of different necessities. It is also wrong to build a toilet for the tourists when the residents do not have one. Toilets plays a significant role in preventing the spread of some deadly diseases (Pierce, 2016). The community in this case are living in total poverty because those who lead them are greedy. From this great development opportunity which was triggered by tourists, those who are in charge could have utilised the received money to develop the wellbeing of the residents. When the tourists arrived, most of the residents were so welcoming. Some of them dedicated their time to even act as tour guides for the tourists, clean the area and establish artwork that would attract them. Having spent a lot of time and energy in doing so, they were never paid well. The money which they could have been paid was stolen by those in charge. This was unethical because human beings deserve better pay for the tasks they undertake and using public resources for personal gains is wrong. Failing to publish financial statements between 2004 and 2012 shows that those in charge were massively stealing public funds and did not want people to realize through the financial statements. The prime minister in this case was aware that corruption was the order of the day and was ready root it out. From the video, most of the politicians live in luxury while so many residents remain in poverty. This is not right because the residents are the ones who contribute in generating the money which make the politicians to live good lives (Wright, 2012). When the tourist arrived, the residents played a key role of welcoming them, selling products to them, and showing them some of their cultural practices. This means they were supposed to fully benefit from what was received from the visitors. 2.PO cruises acted ethically because the tourists did their part. What was questionable is how the authorities spent the money. When the tourists came, some of the residents had some stores to sell various goods to them. The visitors were so generous because they sometimes told the residents to keep the change when they purchased a particular product. The tourists were also so friendly to the residents. They were interested with various services which the residents offered (Yap, 2017). They paid those who had something unique to show case as a way of appreciating and motivating the residents. This means the PO cruises had done something good to the people because it has brought them an opportunity which would change their lives if the money was well utilized. When some of the tourist heard that the few available toilets were made for the foreigners, they were surprised (King, 2012). They did not imagine how a foreigner can have a toilet yet the residents who are the taxpayers do not. Showing concern towards this issue indicates that irrespective of feeling that they were being valued, they were also concerned with the wellbeing of the residents. Tourists remains off-limits to the people in this island (Wright, 2012). PO cruises did good to make the residents experience what tourism is all about. Tourism plays a significant role in developing an area and therefore it was a good action for the PO cruises to bring the foreigners in this area. Who should be responsible for rectifying issued that you have identified? Why? Explain your reasoning The people who should be responsible for rectifying the issue is the government and the agencies that are concerned with tourism and developments (King, 2015). From the case, Vanuatu is an island that should be developed based on the fact that the tourist came with a lot of money. The government and concerned agencies should investigate to identify where the money went. The residents should also play a role in rectifying the issue (Okech, 2010). They should always question about how public resources are being utilised when they suspect things are not going as expected. They have the right to make those who are in charge to show how each coin obtained from the tourists was used. The residents should avoid electing leaders whose ethical track records are questionable. From the case, we are told that financial statements of different years were not provided. This indicates that an individual or a group of people was misusing public funds and did not want the public to know (Klintman, 2012). Based on this factor, the residents should unit and question why that was happening. Chief tourism stakeholders like for example PO cruises should also act to rectify the issue (Okech, 2010). They should ensure the money received from the visitors is utilised to benefit those who are involved in conducting activities which pleases the visitors and also to develop the wellbeing of the community. 3.From this case, the government is the key stakeholder which should have intervened to resolve this issue. The residents were experiencing problems because those who should have intervened were among were corrupt and after personal gains (King, 2012). One of the ways which the vanuatus government would have done to address the issue is making sure the money that was received from the activity was properly used. The government of Australia and that of Vanuatu should have worked together to investigate the matter and take legal action upon the culprits. The disciplinary action should be strong enough and publicized so that those who had intentions to misuse public funds for personal gains can learn a lesson. Vanuatu government would have ensured that those who were in charge of the money were people who understood the importance of ensuring the community lives in good conditions. Having corrupt individuals in the government was the primary cause of the problems which the residents were experiencing (Wright, 2012). The government of Australia and that of Vanuatus should have ensure financial statements were availed to the public each year for scrutiny. The other way in which the government of Vanautu would have done to intervene the situation is ensuring the foreigners do not seem to be favoured more than the residents. Although this may seem a special consideration to the tourists, some of them may see it as some form of discriminating the residents and even decide to never to visit the area again (Dimitrova, 2015). The reason why the tourists may feel so is because being in an area where hygiene and sanitation is not valued may risk them to getting various diseases even if they had special toilets. The Vanutu government should also encourage the residents to engage in income generating activities to root out poverty in the region. This could be through opening small businesses, engaging in faming activities and relating well with the tourists. 4.To overcome such issues in future, the government should scrutinize all officials to ensure they value integrity in what they do (Okech, 2010). The reason which made this issue to arise was because the government officials were very corrupt and did not mind the wellbeing of the people. Ensuring high level of integrity among the government officials will assist in having leaders who are focused to development rather than personal gains. The residents can also play a role in preventing this issues from happening in the future by pressing the government to correctly utilize the money received from the tourists (Pierce, 2016). When the residents remain silent over the issue, those who steal the money will never see the importance of not stealing what should be utilized for development. The residents should also consider electing only leaders who knows the importance of attracting tourists and those who knows the importance of developments. Lastly, such issues can be prevented in the future by ensuring the legal measures are taken upon those who misuse money received from the tourists (Wright, 2012). Taking legal measures will assist in making the corrupt officials to quite from engaging in such activities and hence lead to proper utilization of the money earned through tourism. Bibliography Dimitrova, M., 2015. The Ethics of Tourism. Critical and Applied Perspectives. European Journal of Tourism Research, Volume 10, pp. 57-65. King, S., 2012. 'Australia Speaks': Reactions to Political Opinion Polls in Australia 1941-1943. Flinders Journal of History and Politics, Volume 28, pp. 78-96. King, V., 2015. Encounters and Mobilities: Conceptual Issues in Tourism Studies in Southeast Asia. SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 30(2), pp. 541-562. Klintman, M., 2012. Issues of Scale in the Global Accreditation of Sustainable Tourism: Schemes toward Harmonized Re-Embeddedness?. Sustainability : Science, Practice, Policy, 8(1), pp. 87-95. Okech, R., 2010. Tourism Impacts on Local Communities around Coastal Zones: Issues of Sustainable Development. Journal of Tourism Challenges and Trends, 3(1), pp. 21-35. Pierce, J., 2016. Mythic Frontiers: Remembering, Forgetting, and Profiting from Cultural Heritage Tourism. The Arkansas Historical Quarterly, 75(3), pp. 12-23. Wright, C. B., 2012. On the Edge of Crisis: Contending Perspectives on Development, Tourism, and Community Participation on Rote Island, Indonesia. Austrian Journal of South - East Asian Studies, 5(1), pp. 95-102. Yap, O. F., 2017. When Do Citizens Take Costly Action against Government Corruption? Evidence from Experiments in Australia, Singapore, and the United States. Journal of East Asian Studies, 17(1), pp. 25-52